PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n A publication ethics and publication malpractice statement<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Ethical guidelines for journal publication<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n (These guidelines are based on existing Elsevier policies).<\/p>\n The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal\u00a0\u00a0International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies (ISSN 2348-8212 )<\/strong>is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing<\/p>\n Our publisher of the journal\u00a0International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies (ISSN 2348-8212 )<\/strong>\u00a0takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.<\/p>\n We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, publisher and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and\/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.<\/p>\n DUTIES OF AUTHORS\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n (These guidelines are based on existing Elsevier policies).<\/p>\n Reporting standards<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work.<\/p>\n Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.<\/p>\n Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial \u00ebopinion\u00ed works should be clearly identified as such.<\/p>\n Data access and retention<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.<\/p>\n Originality and plagiarism<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and\/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from \u00ebpassing off\u00ed another\u00eds paper as the author\u00eds own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another\u00eds paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.<\/p>\n Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper. Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g. clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication.<\/p>\n Acknowledgement of sources<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.<\/p>\n Authorship of the paper<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.<\/p>\n Fundamental errors in published works<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his\/her own published work, it is the author\u00eds obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.<\/p>\n PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT A publication ethics and publication malpractice statement Ethical guidelines for journal publication (These guidelines are based on existing Elsevier policies). The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal\u00a0\u00a0International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies (ISSN 2348-8212 )is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ijlljs.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ijlljs.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ijlljs.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ijlljs.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ijlljs.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/ijlljs.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":180,"href":"http:\/\/ijlljs.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14\/revisions\/180"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ijlljs.in\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"